[Feedback] JDownloader VS Load!

If you have feedback or useful suggestions/ideas, this is the place to post!
Post Reply
10% Load!er
Posts: 17
Joined: 06 Jun 2011 13:56
[Feedback] JDownloader VS Load!

Post by Gaga »

After using JDownloader over years, i switched to Load!.
JDownloader is great but as heavy resources problems. It used up to 400-800mb ram and needed over 8 seconds to start (AMD 1090T processor, 8GB high speed ram, sata III drive). I searched for an alternative and found Load!.

Here is a short list of positive things:

- Hugh amount of hosters & decrypters are supported
- Important plugins are fixed within a few hours
- Big comunity, if you need help you will find it

- Extremely nice speed & very stable
- Very very nice GUI so much better than JDownloader
- Less features but it doesn't seem to be overcharged (which is a positive point for me)

At the end every user has to decide on their own which software he will use.
But i am so happy with Load! Because of the things i listed above.

So if you using exotic hosters & decrypters then you probably need JD but if not, fucking take Load!. I am new to CandiSoft and i can not say much about their support, but currently all my needs are satisfied by Load!.

User avatar
CandiSoft Support
Posts: 1320
Joined: 25 Feb 2009 20:11
Re: [Feedback] JDownloader VS Load!

Post by Vash »

Hello Gaga and welcome on the CandiSoft forums! Thanks for the nice words, we really appreciate it! ;)
Load! - The Best Way To Load Your Files

Post Reply